Tuesday, 5 June 2012

Charge sheet can’t be quashed in a casual manner: SC

New Delhi, June 4, 2012 (PTI): A charge sheet filed in departmental proceeding cannot be quashed by courts unless it adversely affects the rights of the aggrieved employee, the Supreme Court has held. 

“In fact, charge sheet does not infringe the right of a party. It is only when a final order imposing the punishment or otherwise adversely affecting a party is passed, it may have a grievance and cause of action.

“Thus, a charge sheet or show cause notice in disciplinary proceedings should not ordinarily be quashed by the court,” said a bench of justices B S Chauhan and Dipak Misra, in an order.

The bench passed the order while disposing of an appeal by the Ministry of Defence challenging a Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) order quashing the charge sheet against one Prabhash Chandra Mirdha in a two-decade old bribery case.

“Law does not permit quashing of charge sheet in a routine manner. In case the delinquent employee has any grievance in respect of the charge sheet, he must raise the issue by filing a representation and wait for the decision of the disciplinary authority thereon.

“In case the charge sheet is challenged before a court/ tribunal on the ground of delay in initiation of disciplinary proceedings or delay in concluding the proceedings, the court/ tribunal may quash the charge sheet after considering the gravity of the charge and all relevant factors involved in the case after weighing all the facts, both for and against the delinquent employee, and must reach the conclusion which is just and proper in the circumstance,” the bench said.

The bench said charge sheet cannot generally be a subject matter of challenge as it does not adversely affect the rights of the delinquent unless it is established that the same has been issued by an authority not competent to initiate the disciplinary proceedings.

Incentive Scheme for delivery of letters carrying Aadhar Number of the residents

Incentive Scheme for delivery of letters carrying Aadhar Number of the residents

Click here to view Department of Posts (BD & Mktg Directorate) OM dated 30.05.2012 on the above subject matter.

Sibal releases stamp on Urs


AJMER: Union HRD minister Kapil Sibal offered prayers at the shrine of Khwaja Moinuddin Chisty on Sunday and also released a postal stamp on the 800thUrs of the sufi saint.
Sibal, joined by MoS for communications and IT Sachin Pilot, braved the heat and walked nearly a kilometre to reach the dargah.
"I offer prayers for the country and seek blessings for the poor," Sibal said after releasing the stamp. A postal stamp was earlier released on Urs in 1989.
The two ministers reached the dargah area around 4.30 pm. Owing to a huge rush of devotees, the district administration found it difficult to make way for a cavalcade of cars. The two decided to get down from the car and walked to the mausoleum.
While both were surrounded by a fleet of cops, the ministers waved at the crowd that gathered to see them.
At the dargah, the Anjuman committee and dargah committee welcomed the ministers.
Sibal, however, avoided questions on price hike and inflation, instead said, "We wish prosperity in the country."
 
Source : http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com

transfer/postings in the Higher Administrative Grade (HAG) of Indian Postal Service, Group ‘A’

The following transfer/postings in the Higher Administrative Grade (HAG) of Indian Postal Service, Group ‘A’ has been ordered vide Department of Posts (Personnel Division) Memo No. 1-1/2009-SPG dated 4th June, 2012.

Sl. No.
Name & Batch of the Officer
Present Posting
Posting on Transfer
1.
Shri S.K. Chakrabarti (IPoS-1978)
CPMG, West Bengal Circle, Kolkata
CPMG, Odisha Circle, Bhubnaeswar
2.
Ms. Humera Ahmed(IPoS-1979)
CPMG, Maharastra Circle, Mumbai
CPMG, West Bengal Circle, Kolkata
3.
Shri A.K. Sharma (IPoS-1981)
CPMG, Odisha Circle, Bhubnaeswar
CPMG, Maharastra Circle, Mumbai

Reply given by Directorate on holding of Sr Postmaster Exam

It was replied by Directorate to the General Secretary of All India Association of IPs/ASPs that the question of Amendment of Recruitment Rules for Senior Postmasters, has to be examined only after final outcome of the court cases. In regard to Calendar of Departmental Examination, the date was tentatively notified and the date of actual holding has to be decided on knowing the outcome of court cases filed in various Tribunals.
 
Copy of the said Directorate reply letter in File No. A.34012/06/2011-DE is reproduced below.


File No. A.34012/06/2011-DE Government of India



Ministry of Communications and IT

Department of Posts

(DE Section)

Dak Bhavan, New Delhi 110116.

Dated 13th April, 2012.


To,


The General Secretary,


All India Association of Inspectors and Asstt Supdt. Posts,


Quarter No. 12, P&T Colony, Khurshid Square,


Civil Lines, Delhi 110 054.


Sub : Limited Departmental Competitive Examination for promotion to the cadre of Senior Postmaster (Gazetted).

Sir,


I am directed to refer to your letter No. CHQ/IPASP/Sr.Postmaster/2012 dated 22/3/2012 on the above mentioned subject.

2. Your contention that, the clarification given by the Directorate, is not in conformity with the Hon’ble CAT Hyderabad bench orders on 21/1/2/2011 is not correct. The Hon’ble CAT Hyderabad bench admitted the Original Application Number 1316/2011 filed by All India Association of Inspectors and Assistant Superintendent Posts Andhra Pradesh circle, represented by Shri S. Shabbir and two others on the question of non permission of Asst. Superintendents, to appear in the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination for promotion to the cadre of Senior Postmaster. It gave an interim order in Para 4 of their order dated 21/12/2011 which reads “as in the original notification/rules, there is no prohibition for the ASPs from appearing for the examination, it is directed that all the eligible ASPs shall be allowed to appear for the examination and their answer sheets shall be evaluated and shall be kept in a sealed cover without publishing their result until further orders”. Therefore, the CAT has not given any finding.


3. On receipt of above Interim order, the case was examined and the Competent Authority has ordered for postponing the Examination till the final disposal of the court cases. Besides the above, two more individual cases are filed in Hon’ble CAT Hyderabad, two cases in Cuttack bench, one case in Chandigarh bench. All these cases are being defended.

4. The question of Amendment of Recruitment Rules for Senior Postmasters, has to be examined only after final outcome of the court cases. In regard to Calendar of Departmental Examination, the date was tentatively notified and the date of actual holding has to be decided on knowing the outcome of court cases filed in various Tribunals.


5. This issues with the approval of Competent Authority.


Yours faithfully,

Sd/-

Asst. Director General (DE)

Rotational Transfer Guidelines - Clarification on 6 years Station Tenure

It was clarified by Directorate vide letter no 141-91/2012-SPB-II dated 28.05.2012   that the provisions of Station Tenure of 6 years prescribed in R.T guidelines 2012-13 is not applicable to Postal Assistants/Stg Assistants except when transfers are ordered in administrative interest and under exigencies of service.
 
Click here to view to the said Directorate letter in original.