(INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT 1872 QN 51-75)
51. Which
is relevant in Section 8?
a) Cause b) Occasion
c) Preparation d) All the above Ans:c
52. A
is accused of murder of B by beating him whatever is said or done by A or B or
by standers at beating or so shortly before or after it as to form part of
transaction is a relevant fact under section-
a) Section
6 b) Section 9
c) Section
12 d) Section 8 Ans:a
53. Which
of the following is not relevant under section 8 of Indian Evidence act?
a) Intention b) Occasion
c) Preparation d) Previous conduct Ans:b
54. Under
section 8 of Evidence Act-
a) Preparation
is relevant b) conduct is relevant
c) Motive
is relevant d) All the above Ans:d
55. In
which of these expert opinion is relevant?
a) Foreign
law b) Finger prints
c)
Art
d) All the above Ans:d
56. Under
section 7 of Indian Evidence act-
a) Identity
is relevant b) Opportunity
is relevant
c) Introductory
is relevant d) Conduct is relevant Ans:b
57. Which
of the following statement is not relevant in a case where A is tried for
murder?
a)
That A
quarreled with dead person three days before incident
b)
That A
has purchased a knife one hour before incident
c)
That A
is a man of good character
d)
That A
is a man of bad character Ans:d
58. Under
section 7 the following are relevant-
a) Occasion b) Cause & effect
c) Opportunity & state of things d) All
the above Ans:d
59. Under
section 8 the following are relevant
a) Motive b) Preparation
c) Previous
conduct d) Subsequent conduct
e) All
the above Ans:e)
60. Relevancy
of facts forming part of same transaction
a)
Whether
they occurred at the same time and place
b)
Whether
they occurred at the different time and place
c)
Both
the A & B
d)
Neither
A nor B Ans:c(6)
61. Which
of the following statement is not correct?
a)
No fact
of which the court will take notice need be proved
b)
The
facts admitted need not be proved
c)
All the
facts and contents of documents
d)
Oral
evidence must be direct Ans:c
62. Section
56 of Indian evidence act-
a) Fact
of which the court must take judicial notice
b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved
b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved
c) In
criminal cases previous good character relevant
d) All
the above Ans:b
63. Section
57 of Indian evidence act-
a) Fact
of which the court must take judicial notice
b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved
b) Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved
c) In
criminal cases previous good character relevant
d) All
the above Ans:a
64. Fact
admitted need not be proved according to
a) Section
55 b) Section 56
c) Section
57 d) Section 58
65. Under
section 57(1) of Indian Evidence act,
court shall take judicial notice of-
a)
All
laws in force in India
b)
All
laws including foreign law
c)
All
Indian and Asian law
d)
All
Indian and British laws up to 1950 Ans:a
66. Court
will take judicial notice of the following -
a)
All
laws in force in territory
of India
b)
The
accession to office names, titles, functions and signatures of the persons
filling for the time being any public office in any state if the fact of their
appointment to such office is notified in any official gazette.
c)
The
commencement continuance and termination of hostilities between the Government
of India and any other state or body
d)
All the
above Ans:d
67. Of
which of following fact the court will not take judicial notice?
a)
Common
law of Britain
b)
Law of
state of Indian
c)
Division
of time
d)
Local
general customs and tradition of India Ans:d
68. Fact
which need not be proved explained in ______of Indian evidence act.
a) Part
II, Chapter III b) Part II, Chapter IV
c) Part
III, Chapter II d) Part IV, Chapter V Ans:a
69 Judicial
notice of fact that many blind persons have acquired great academic
destinations, can be taken by court
a) Gowhari Das Vs. Santilata Singh
b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar
c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal
d) None of these Ans:b(57)
70. Implied
admission in written statement cannot be allowed to be withdrawn. However, the plaintiff can be insisted upon
to prove his case
a) Uttam Chand Kothari Vs. Gauri Shankar Jalan.
b) Jai Shankar Prasar Vs. State of Bhihar
c) Afzauddin Ansary Vs. State of West Bengal
d) None of these Ans:a(58)
71. The
conduct of an eye witness in non disclosing the incident to anybody for a
number of days. In highly unnatural on and is sufficient to reject testimony
a) Gowhari Das V. Santilata Singh
b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar
c) Ganpat Kndiba Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra
d) None of these Ans:c(8)
72. Role
of motive in an offence the case of prosecution becomes more easier to connect
accused to the alleged incident.
a) PV Narayana Vs. State of Andra Pradesh
b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar
c) Afzauddin Ansary V. State of West Bengal
d) None of these Ans:a(8)
73. When
motive is not sine qua non for proving the prosecution case
a) Gowhari Das V. Santilata Singh
b) Jai Shankar Prasar V. State of Bhihar
c) Yunish alias Kariya Vs. State of Madhya
Pradesh
d) None of these Ans:c(57)
74. Which is not main principle that underlies law of evidence?
a) The evidence must be confined to matter in issue
b) Hearsay evidence must be admitted
c) Hearsay evidence must be admitted
d) The best evidence must be given cases Ans:c
75. Section 59 of Indian Evidence Act is-
a) Proof of facts by oral evidence b) Secondary evidence
b) Oral evidence must be
direct d) Proof of contents of
documents Ans:a(59)
For latest update visit http://katiharho.blogspot.in
(Prepared by AB Kantharaja, Mobile 08969822340, http://abkantharaja.blogspot.in)
