Q123 Which one of the following document is not a valuable security ? Answer : |
Q124 Preambleless statue is a rare occurrence. But there are some statues do not have a preamble which of the following statues has no preamble Answer : Government of India Act 1935 |
Q125 In which of the following cases did the supreme court rule that harmony and balance in fundamental rights and directive principles is the basic feature of Indian Constitution Answer : Minerva Mills V UOI |
Q126 There is no reason to compel non smokers to be helpless victims of air pollution was held in Answer : Murali Derora V Union of India |
Q127 Which of the following has the power to establish a common high court for two or more states and union territory Answer : Parliament |
Q128 Which article of the Indian constitution gives power to governor to grant pardon in certain cases Answer : Article 161 |
Q129 Under article 141 if high court distinguishing judgment of apex court on ground that there was no elaborate discussion and no reason is discernible which is clearly violative of judicial discipline held in Answer |
Q130 Part IV A was added to the constitution of India by the Answer : 42nd amendment |
Q131 By which of the following amendment act of 1985 anti defection law was added in the constitution Answer : 52nd Amendment |
Q132 The amendment procedure laid down in Indian Constitution on the pattern of Answer : Constitution of Canada |
Q133 Does appeal lie in petty cases Answer : NO |
Q134 Is refusal to record FIR by the in charge Police Officer punishable? Answer |
Q135 Under CRPC inherent power is given to Answer : High Court |
Q136 The warrant has to be signed by Answer : Judge or magistrate who issued the warrant |
Q137 Non sealed warrant of arrest is Answer : |
Q138 How should the bond be secured if the arrested person is not resident in India ? Answer : Bond need to be secured by a surety or sureties resident of India |
Q139 The term obstruction used under section 41( 1) CRPC includes |
Q140 The warrant of arrest is ordinarily directed to Answer : Police officer |
Q141 Is it permissible to pursue an offender an arrest him in a foreign country Answer : yes under proper authority of the country |
Q142 A police officer can keep a person under police custody after his arrest without the written sanction of magistrate for Answer : Not more than 24 Hours |
Q143 Anticipatory bail can be granted by Answer : Court of session and high court |
Q144 Parliament has enacted a path breaking legislation empowering people and promoting transparency in public affairs the name of law is Answer : The Right to information act 2005 |
Q145 The right to information act extends to Answer : Whole India except the state of J & K |
Q146 An appeal can be filed under section 19 of the right to information 2005 within Answer : 30 Days |
Q147 Which of the following has not been defined under section 2 of the right to information act Answer |
Q148 Central information commission hold office for a term of Answer : Five Year |
Q149 Under which section of right to information act , information is given Answer : Section 4 |
Q150 Under section 20 of the right to information act maximum penalty can be imposed up to Answer `25000/- |
Thursday, 27 October 2011
Solved Question Paper IPO EXAM 2011 Question No 123-150
Posting of husband and wife at the same station
Posting of husband and wife at the same station.
Concerning the posting at the same place of husband and wife who are working in Government service, the transfer issues have been raised in Parliament on several occasions. In 1980s these demands began to show its seriousness, because the percentage of women employees were increased in joining the Government services.
The Central Government also observed this issue from various forums, a circular had been issued by the Department of Social Welfare in Feb 1976 to all Head of Departments to give serious consideration to the requests of posting of husband and wife at the same station. In order to that order, lot of women employees started to send their request to transfer at the place where their husbands are posted.
The Central Government gave its utmost importance to this issue and as far as possible and within the constraints of adminstrative feasibility, the husband and wife should be posted at the same station to enable them to lead a normal family life and to ensure the education and welfare of thier children. The Department of Personnel and Training issued an OM on 3.4.86, in accordance with the guidelines and instructions in the order given by the Government, all cadre controlling authorities should consider such requests with the utmost sympathy.
The Department of Personnel and Training issued various office memorandums regarding this matter from time to time. The motive of the Government on the petitioners, said in the orders repeatedly, to give utmost importance attached to the enhancement of women’s status in all walks of life and to enable them to lead a normal family life as also to ensure the education and welfare of the children.
Till recently, the persmin has issued total of six orders pertaining the above subject on its website. After implementation of the 6th CPC, the last order has been issued on 30.09.2009. The order said that “On the basis of the 6th CPC reprot, Government servants have already been allowed the facility of Child Care Leave which is admissible till the children attain 18 years of age”. The consolidated guidelines concerened this subject has been provided in the OM dated 12.06.1997. The consolidated guidelines has been amended and published in the last order after implementation of 6th CPC.
In the main guidelines, ”The husband & wife, if working in the same Department and if the required level of post is available, should invariably be posted together in order to enable them to lead a normal family life and look after the welfare of their children especially till the children attain 18 years of age. This will not apply on appointment under the central Staffing Scheme. Where only wife is a Govt. servant, the above concessions would be applicable to the Govt. servant. Complaints are sometimes received that even if posts are available in the station of posting of the spouse, the administrative authorities do not accommodate the employees citing administrative reasons. In all such cases, the cadre controlling authority should strive to post the employee at the station of the spouse and in case of inability to do so, specific reasons, therefor, may be communicated to the employee”.
We have made a table of orders for your kind consideration…
The affected employees feel that although the all guidelines for implementing the facility issued by the Government, the Head of Departments are not feasible to make it clear to stricken employees.
Concerning the posting at the same place of husband and wife who are working in Government service, the transfer issues have been raised in Parliament on several occasions. In 1980s these demands began to show its seriousness, because the percentage of women employees were increased in joining the Government services.
The Central Government also observed this issue from various forums, a circular had been issued by the Department of Social Welfare in Feb 1976 to all Head of Departments to give serious consideration to the requests of posting of husband and wife at the same station. In order to that order, lot of women employees started to send their request to transfer at the place where their husbands are posted.
The Central Government gave its utmost importance to this issue and as far as possible and within the constraints of adminstrative feasibility, the husband and wife should be posted at the same station to enable them to lead a normal family life and to ensure the education and welfare of thier children. The Department of Personnel and Training issued an OM on 3.4.86, in accordance with the guidelines and instructions in the order given by the Government, all cadre controlling authorities should consider such requests with the utmost sympathy.
The Department of Personnel and Training issued various office memorandums regarding this matter from time to time. The motive of the Government on the petitioners, said in the orders repeatedly, to give utmost importance attached to the enhancement of women’s status in all walks of life and to enable them to lead a normal family life as also to ensure the education and welfare of the children.
Till recently, the persmin has issued total of six orders pertaining the above subject on its website. After implementation of the 6th CPC, the last order has been issued on 30.09.2009. The order said that “On the basis of the 6th CPC reprot, Government servants have already been allowed the facility of Child Care Leave which is admissible till the children attain 18 years of age”. The consolidated guidelines concerened this subject has been provided in the OM dated 12.06.1997. The consolidated guidelines has been amended and published in the last order after implementation of 6th CPC.
In the main guidelines, ”The husband & wife, if working in the same Department and if the required level of post is available, should invariably be posted together in order to enable them to lead a normal family life and look after the welfare of their children especially till the children attain 18 years of age. This will not apply on appointment under the central Staffing Scheme. Where only wife is a Govt. servant, the above concessions would be applicable to the Govt. servant. Complaints are sometimes received that even if posts are available in the station of posting of the spouse, the administrative authorities do not accommodate the employees citing administrative reasons. In all such cases, the cadre controlling authority should strive to post the employee at the station of the spouse and in case of inability to do so, specific reasons, therefor, may be communicated to the employee”.
We have made a table of orders for your kind consideration…
S.No. | O.M. No. | O.M. Date | Subject | Link |
1. | No.28034/7/86-Estt.(A) | 03/04/1986 | Posting of husband and wife at the same station. | Click here |
2. | No. A-B 14017/41/90-Estt. (RR) | 10/05/1990 | Posting of Physically Handicapped Candidates. | Click here |
3. | No. AB 14017/41/90- Estt. (RR) | 15/02/1991 | Posting of Government employees who have mentally retarded children. | Click here |
4. | No. 28034/2/97-Estt. (A) | 12/06/1997 | Posting of husband and wife at the same station. | Click here |
5. | No.14017/16/2002-Estt(RR) | 13/03/2002 | Posting of physically handicapped candidates | Click here |
6. | No. 28034/9/2009-Estt.(A) | 30/09/2009 | Posting of husband and wife at the same station | Click here |
The affected employees feel that although the all guidelines for implementing the facility issued by the Government, the Head of Departments are not feasible to make it clear to stricken employees.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)