Re-uploaded on 11.01.13
1.Execute script files in the sequence (in Server machine only).
1.Execute script files in the sequence (in Server machine only).
2.Execute MMUpdater in all machines including Server.
VIA - SRFIX BLOG
Sunday, 20 January 2013
GPF Interest Calculator for the year 2012-13
Want to calculate the Interest that you get out of your General Provident Fund deposits for the year 2012-13?
Click here to use GConnect GPF Interst Calculator which is updated now with Interest calculation for the financial year 2012-13.
Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance has marginally increased the interest rate from 8.6% (paid for the period from 1.12.2011 to 31.03.2012) to 8.8% with effect from 01.04.2012 for deposits made in various Provident funds (including GeneralProvident Fund) applicable to Central Government Employees.
The resolution F.No: 5(1) – B (PD)/2012 dated 22.05.2012 passed in this regard is reproduced below
Go to GConnect GPF Interst Calculator for the financial year 2012-13.(PUBLISHED IN PART I SECTION OF GAZETTE OF INDIA)F.No.5(1)-B(PD)/2012Government of IndiaMinistry of Finance(Department of Economic affairs)New Delhi, the 22nd May, 2012RESOLUTIONIt is announced for general information that during the year 2012-2013, accumulations at the credit of subscribers to the General Provident Fund and other similar funds shall carry interest at the rate of 8.8% (Eight point eight per cent) per annum. This rates will be in force during the financial year beginning on 1.4.2012.
The funds concerned are :-
1. The General Provident Fund (Central Services).
2. The Contributory Provident Fund (India).
3. The All India Services Provident Fund.
4. The State Railway Provident Fund.
5. The General Provident Fund (Defence Services).
6. The Indian Ordnance Department Provident Fund.
7. The Indian Ordnance Factories Workmen’s Provident Fund.
8. The Indian Naval Dockyard Workmen’s Provident Fund.
9. The Defence Services Officers Provident Fund.
10. The Armed Forces Personnel Provident Fund.
2. Ordered that the Resolution be published in Gazette of India.
sd/-(Brajendra Navnit)Deputy Secretary (Budget)
Web Portal for Project Arrow
A Web Portal for Project Arrow has been developed so that
objectives and deliverables of the project are widely disseminated in the
public domain and a proper channel is put in place for receiving feedback from
stakeholders i.e. post office customers and the staff members. This
interactive interface will facilitate in getting feedback and suggestions from
customers across the country which will be vital inputs for further improving
both the core operations and the ‘Look and Feel’ of Project Arrow Post
Offices.
Please
click here (Project Arrow Administrator Operations Guide ) and view details.
REVISION OF ESTABLISHMENT - GENERAL RULE
CHAPTER XVI REVISION OF ESTABLISHMENT—GENERAL RULES
POWERS
Rule 523.
The
powers of officer of the Department in respect of creation, revision or
abolition of establishments are defined in the Schedule of Financial
Powers of Officers of the Indian Postal Department.
SUBMISSION
OF PROPOSALS FOR FIXED ESTABLISHMENTS TO THE
DIRECTORATE
GENERAL.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS FOR FIXED ESTABLISHMENTS TO THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL.
524.
All
proposals made by Divisional Heads of Postal/Railway Mail Service,
Chief Postmasters, Executive Engineer/ Superintendent Engineer will be
submitted by Heads of Circles to the Director General directly. In such
cases, the papers containing the proposals will be forwarded to the
sanctioning authority, in consultation with the Circle IFA, by the Head
of the Circle who will personally add the following sentence in his
forwarding letter :-
"The figures shown as representing the present cost of the establishment
affected by this proposal has been verified by the Circle IFA in its
verification certificate No. .,dated the ……(enclosed)."
The proposals relating to BD and Marketing, PLI, Postal Directorate,
Civil Wing should be sent through the respective CGMs/DDsG/Chief
Engineer (C)
Note
-
Every proposal must be submitted to the Director General at least three
months in advance (in case of fixed establishment) and two months (in
case of temporary establishment) of the date from which sanction is
desired. In the case of Postal and Railway Mail Service, where
necessary, it must be supported by a statistical memorandum and a copy
of the value return.
CHAPTER XVII
REVISION OF ESTABLISHMENT POST OFFICE AND RAILWAY MAIL SERVICE
PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR INCREASES IN ESTABLISHMENTS CHARGES
525.
Before sanctioning proposals for the creation or revision of fixed
establishments or for the employment of experimental and temporary
establishments, the authority empowered to sanction or revise the
establishment must personally scrutinize them and satisfy
herself/himself that they are fully justified with reference to the
standards and rules on the subject.
PREPARATION OFPROPOSALS REGARDING FIXED ESTABLISHMENTS
526.
Every letter containing a proposal for the creation, revision or
abolition of fixed establishments should explain fully the grounds on
which it is based, along with the financial effect clearly. In other
words, the letter should show the
present cost of the establishment or portion of establishment affected, details
of the number and pay of the appointments which it is proposed to add or
modify, and the cost after revision of the establishment or portion of
establishment concerned, the particulars being exhibited in tabular
form. (For further instructions see Posts & Telegraphs Initial,
Account Code, Vol-I). For this purpose the establishment charges should be taken to be divided into four portions,
as shown below :-
(a)
In the case of a Head Office or a very large Sub Office
(1) clerical establishment;
(2) delivery establishment;
(3) class IV establishment
(4) other items such as contingent allowance of the office, house rent, etc.
(b)
In the case of a Railway Mail Service Division
(i) Sorting Assistant establishment
(2)Mail Guards establishments
(3) Class IV establishment;
(4) Other items such as contingent allowance, allowance to attendants at rest house, etc.
Exception—When it is proposed to revise or abolish an existing
house-rent charge, or to incur a new one, details should be given only
in respect of the items of house rent that are affected by the proposal.
527.
When it is proposed to transfer an appointment or other establishment
charge from one office or division to another, the proposal should
contain: (a) the abolition of the appointment or charge in its old
office or division, and simultaneous creation of the appointment or
charge in the new office or division.
529.
In the case of an office, line appointment or other establishment charge
which is proposed for only a portion of each year or the cost of which
is higher during a portion of a year than during the rest of the year,
one twelfth of its total annual cost should be taken as its monthly
cost.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS REGARDING FIXED ESTABLISHMENT TO THE HEAD OF THE CIRCLE
530.
Every proposal made by a Supdt. or Chief Postmaster or
Executive Engineer/ Superintending Engineer, as the case may be, must be submitted to the Head of the Circle at
least three months in advance of the date from which sanction is desired
and where necessary, it must be supported by a statistical statement in
Form Est.2, Est.3 or Est.3(a) as the case may be.
531.
A value return in Form Est.5 or Est6(a), as the case may be, should be submitted with every proposal :-
(1) in connection with experimental post office,
(2) for increasing the establishment charge of a branch office
(3) for converting a branch office into a sub office,
(4) for closing an office on the ground of its being un-remunerative.
(5) for increasing the cost of those mail lines which benefit branch offices only.
532.
When a proposal involves a revision of the signaling charges of a
combined office, it should be accompanied by an abstract statement of
the telegraph statistics and revenue of the office for the prceding six
months.
PROPOSALS FOR TEMPORARY ESTABLISHMENTS
533.
Proposals for the employment of temporary establishments (including
those required for telegraph work in combined offices) should be
submitted by Supdt. or Chief Postmaste or Executive Engineer or
Superintendent Eningeer as the case may be to the Head of the Circle
direct. The grounds on which the proposal should be clearly and fully
stated and the date from and the period for which the establishment is
likely to be required should be specified. Proposals should be submitted
at least two months in advance of the date from which sanction is
required.
NOTE:- When it is found that a sanctioned temporary etablishment needs
revision, a fresh proposal should be submitted to the Head of the Circle
stating the revised temporary establishment for which sanction is
actually needed.
SANCTION TO PROPOSALS REGARDING FIXED AND TEMPORARY ESTABLISHMENTS
534.
If a proposal submitted to the competent authority is approved by him
and does not require the sanction of a higher authority, he will issue
an order of sanction to the officer who submitted the proposal,
simultaneously sending copies there of to all concerned, including
Establishment Division of the Postal Directorate. The order of sanction
will specify the date from which the proposal whould be effective and in
the case of a temporary establishment, the period for which it may be
needed.
535.
Under no circumstances should effect be given to a revision of fixed
establishment from a date earlier than the one specified in the order of
sanction and in exceptional cases where the revision is to take place
from a later date, a report must be submitted immediately to the
competent authority stating the date from which the sanction will be
carried out and this date will, at the same time be intimated to the
other offices to whom copies of sanction were sent. If the sanction
involves an increase in expenditure, the competent authority will inform
the Circle IFA and other concerned parties of the revised date of
effect without delay and if a decrease is involved, he will issue a
revised sanction. Similarly, if it is found that the period for which a
temporary establishment has been sanctioned requires alteration, a
report must be submitted to the competent authority without delay,
stating the period for which sanction is actually needed, and on receipt
of this report, a revised order will be issued by him.
536.
If a proposal which requires the Director General’s orders is approved
by him, the Head of the Circle will receive an order of sanction, in
which the date from which the alteration in the fixed establishment
should be carried out or the period for which the temporary
establishment may be employed, as the case may be, will be specified.
The necessary extract from this order will be communicated by the Head
of the Circle to the officer by to whom the proposal was submitted, and a
copy of it will be sent to the Chief Postmaster or the Supdt., or
Executive Engineer/Superintending Engineer, as the case may be. If for
any reason, the sanction to the revision of a fixed
establishment cannot be carried out from the date specified by the
Director General or the period of employment of temporary establishment
specified in his sanction requires alteration, a report must be
submitted at once to the Director General stating the date from which
the sanction will be carried out or the period for which sanction is
actually needed. In the former case, the revised date of effect will be
communicated also to the Circle IFA.
536-A
A sanction involving an increase in expenditure which has not been
carried out within a year of the date of issue of the sanction but
without stipulation in the sanction about the budgetary provisions of a
specified year from which expenditure is to be met, the sanction will
have to be revised / renewed by the sanctioning authority before the
close of the financial year. The sanction will be considered to have
been acted as if payment in whole or in part has been made in pursuance
of the sanction within 12 months from the date of its issue. In cases
when part payment has been made within the stipulated time, the
subsequent payment of the balance may be made without a fresh
expenditure sanction.
REGISTER OF SANCTIONED ESTABLISHMENT
537.
The Supdt. must keep up a register of sanctioned establishments for his
Division in the form A.C.G. 19(a) used for the sane purpose in head
offices. He must ensure that this register is kept corrected properly
and up-to-date.
PERIODICAL REVIEW OF THE WORK OF OFFICE AND SECTIONS
538.
It is necessary, in the best interest of the Department and of the staff
concerned that the work of Head Offices, larger Sub Offices , Mail
Offices, Sections is periodically reviewed as prescribed in the rules to
ensure availability of manpower is commensurate with the amount of work
in each case.
539.
For this purpose, the Head of the Circle, will arrange to receive, at
fixed intervals, statistics of the work of each head office and of each
of the larger sub offices in their circles in the forms prescribed for
revisions of establishment according to the Bewoor;s Time tests. The
intervals
should ordinarily be:-
(a)
Kolkata, Mumbai and all GPOs/HOs/MDGs - Every year
(b)
LSG/HSG SOs- Every three years
Class I SOs –
Every three years
Other T/SOs –
Every three years
(c)
Branch Offices – Every three years
Revision of Allowances of GDS
GDS BPMs/GDS SPMs
– Every three years
Other GDS
– Every three years
Note-1.
Register in the proforma indicated below should be maintained to ensure
that the prescribed review is carried out within the prescribed period.
Note-2.
It would be sufficient to take up the periodical review of a post office
not with reference to the last periodical rview but with refrence to
the latest review taken when additional staff as justified was
sanctioned.
Note 3.
At the time of inspection
of every Head office and Sub Office the Inspecting officers should
examine whether the existing strength of the office is adequate or
requires revisions. The inspecting officer may direct the Postmaster or
Sub postmaster to maintain statistics of the delivery and sorting
branches if he is satisfied after examining the statistics of
accountable articles mentioned by the office that there is some
justification to take up the revision of the existing strength.
Note 4.
The
review of Bos, rationalization of their establishment and revision of
allowance of GDS will be done at the time of review of the SO or HO, as
the case may be. There is no need for inspecting officer to visit BO
separately for this purpose.
Note 5.
Interim
review as necessitated due to revision of norms or on account of any
significant variation of work load of Offices may be undertaken as and
when found necessary.
541.
On receipt of the statistical returns the Head of the Circle will after
satisfying himself that the figures are reliable, consider the question
of retaining the staff of the office or section concerned.
Special statistics must be taken between the periodical reviews if an
abnormal rise or fall in traffic makes such a course available.
POST OFFICE-SPECIAL RULES -ROAD ESTABLISHMENT
544.
The road establishment of each mail line, i.e.the number of GDS Mail
Carrier employed to carry the mails, will depend on the length of the
line and the weight of
mails ordinarily to be conveyed. Wherever practicable, the same GDS Mail
Carrier will carry mails in both directions over his stage.
545.
Before submitting to the Head of the Circle any proposal to increase the
permanent strength of the road establishment of a mail line (except in
cases where the length of the line is increased) the Supdt. must first
satisfy himself/herself that the existing road establishment is not in
consonance with the work required. He must ensure that this can be done
only by revising the mail arrangements, diverting a portion of the mails
to another line sending the letter and parcel mails in the same bag,
reducing the sizes of the bags, reducing the number of bags by
establishing sorting sub-offices, or any other practicable device.
546.
In all cases in which GDS Mail Carriers are employed solely for the benefit of a single office, they must be sanctioned as part of the establishment of that office.
VIA-POSTMASTER MAHARASHTRA BLOG
Prescribed period of Ad-hoc service in Central Government...
Prescribed period of Ad-hoc service in Central Government Services…
The period prescribed for ad hoc service under the Central Government and rules laid down for making ad hoc service permanent…
The total period for which the appointment/promotion may be made, on
adhoc basis, is limited to one year. In case there are compulsions for
extending any adhoc appointment/promotion beyond one year, the approval
of the Department of Personnel & Training has to be sought. Also,
the Department of Personnel & Training has delegated powers to the
administrative Ministries/Departments for appointing the officials of
Group ‘C’ and erstwhile Group ‘D’ posts on ad-hoc basis upto a period of
three years, in consideration of exigency of work.
As per the extant policy of the Government, all posts are to be filled
in accordance with provisions of the applicable Recruitment Rules.
Promotions/appointments on ad-hoc basis are resorted to in exceptional
circumstances, to a post which cannot be kept vacant in consideration of
its functional/operational requirement. Such ad-hoc appointees have to
be replaced with regular incumbents, selected in accordance with
procedure prescribed in the relevant applicable statutory Recruitment
Rules, at the earliest. In view of this, there is no requirement of
making ad-hoc service permanent.
The above information was submitted as a written reply to a question in
the Parliament by the Minister Shri.V.Narayanasamy on 19th December
2012.
Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) for the Railway Employees
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
(RAILWAY BOARD)
S.No. PC-VI/309
No. PC-V/2004/ACP/1
RBE No.01/2013
New Delhi, dated 14.01.2013
The General Managers,
All Indian Railways & Production Units
(As per mailing list)
Subject- Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) for the Railway Employees -regarding.
Please refer to Board’s letter No. PC.V/99/I/1/1, dated 01-10-1999 on
the above subject. Para-8 of the Annexure-1 of Board’s above cited
letter dt. 01-10-1999 provided as under.
“8. The financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme shall be purely personal to the employee and shall have no relevance to his/her seniority position. As such, there shall be no additional financial upgradation for the senior employee on the ground that the junior employee in the grade has got higher pay-scale under the ACP Scheme."
2. The ACP Scheme was applicable upto 31-08-2008 and was replaced by the
Modified Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) with effect from 01.09.2008.
As the revised pay scales are applicable w.e.f. 1.1.2006 , those
employees who received ACP between 01-01-2006 to 31-08-2008 got
financial upgradation under ACP Scheme in the revised pay scales.
3. Instances of senior employees who got benefit under ACP Scheme prior
to 01-01-2006 and are drawing less pay than their juniors who got
benefits under ACP Scheme after 1.1.2006 (i.e. between 01-01-2006 and
31-08-2008) have been considered in consultation ‘with DoP&T and it
has been decided to allow stepping up of pay in such case where the
senior, but for the pay revision on account of 6th CPC, would have
continued to draw higher par, subject to the following conditions:
i. Both the junior and the senior Railway servants should belong
to the same cadre and the posts in which they have been
promoted/financially upgraded should be identical in the same cadre.
ii. The pre-revised scale of pay and the revised grade pay of the
lower and higher posts in which they are entitled to draw pay should be identical
iii. The senior Railway servant should have been drawing equal or more pay than the junior before receiving ACP/Promotion.
iv. The stipulations as contained In DOPT’s O.M
.No,4/7/92-EStt.(Pay-1) dated 04-11-1993 circulated vide Board’s letter
No.F(E)-II/94/PAI/2 dated 07-12-1994 (RBE No.108/94) along with revision
of pay scales may be observed while granting such a stepping up of pay.
4. This issues with the concurrence of the Finance Directorate of the Ministry of Railways.
5. Hindi version is enclosed.
(DoP&T’s OM No.35034/1/97-EStt.(D), dt. 4th October, 2012)
sd/-
(N.P.Singh)
Dy. Director, Pay Commission-V
Railway Board
Source: AIRF
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
