Sunday, 22 July 2012
A look at the six most asked questions on UID
For more than 4 years, the 12-digit number called Aadhaar has generated more debate than action.
But
now that 18 crore Indians do have this number and 42 crore more should
have it by April 2013, it's time to focus more on what the number
will—and can—really do.
For, it is the utility of the card that will make all the struggle in its implementation worthwhile—or worthless.
Here's a look at the six most asked questions on UID
1) What is Aadhaar authentication ? Is an individual's right of privacy ensured?
Aadhaar authentication is a process through which the number, along with other attributes (demographics , biometrics or One-Time Pin), is submitted to UIDAI's Central Identities Data Repository (CIDR) for verification ; the CIDR verifies whether the data submitted matches the data available in CIDR and responds with a "yes/no" . No personal identity information is returned as part of the response.
Aadhaar authentication is a process through which the number, along with other attributes (demographics , biometrics or One-Time Pin), is submitted to UIDAI's Central Identities Data Repository (CIDR) for verification ; the CIDR verifies whether the data submitted matches the data available in CIDR and responds with a "yes/no" . No personal identity information is returned as part of the response.
2) When do I need to authenticate?
Service providers, such as the government for PDS and NREGA or
banks, are expected to link Aadhaar authentication to their services.
Residents would need to authenticate either at the time of subscribing
to the service or at the time of availing service delivery. Then no one
else can avail the benefits meant for a particular resident.
3) How will children be captured in the database?
3) How will children be captured in the database?
No
biometrics for children below 5 years; their UID will be processed on
the basis of demographic information and photograph linked with their
parents' UID. Once they are five years old, they need to be re-enrolled
with biometrics of 10 fingers, iris and photograph. Biometrics will be
updated once they turn 15.
4) What about biometrics of the differently-abled and people with no finger prints or those without fingers?
Biometric
standards prescribed will ensure that these groups are not excluded. In
the case of people without hands/ fingers only photo will be used for
identity determination and there will be markers to determine
uniqueness.
5) How will an Aadhaar-enabled bank account help a resident who already has a bank account?
The
resident can link existing bank account to Adhaar as disbursement of
social security benefits like pensions, scholarships or MGNREGS wages
would only be through Aadhaar-enabled accounts.
UIDAI
is working with states and central ministries to designate
Aadhaar-enabled accounts for disbursal of all social security benefits.
The individual would be able to access Aadhaar enabled bank account
through a low-cost micro-ATM network which
will have large geographical reach. Instant payments through biometric
authentication and mobile payments will also be enabled in the future
for such accounts.
6) What are micro-ATMs ? How will they work in the Aadhaar system?
Micro-ATMs
are biometric authentication enabled hand-held device (also known as a
Point of Transaction terminal). They will primarily allow the following
functions: cash withdrawal, cash deposit, balance enquiry and
remittances . These devices will be operated by business correspondents
(BCs) appointed by banks.
The
physical currency would be handled by this BC and not a machine like a
regular ATM. All transactions will require online biometric
authentication with the UIDAI authentication server in order to be
processed.
Source:-The Economic TimesSigns and Symbols
MDB Backup-Automatic
Stepping up of pay of the promotee senior with direct recruited junior appointed on or after 01.01.2006
KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN(HQ),
18, INSTITUTIONAL AREA SHAH EED JEET SINGH MARG,
NEW DELHI-110016
18, INSTITUTIONAL AREA SHAH EED JEET SINGH MARG,
NEW DELHI-110016
F.110239/58/2008/ KVS (Budget)
Dated: 20.07.2012
The Dy. Commissioner
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan
All Regional Offices
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan
All Regional Offices
Subject: Stepping up of pay of the promotee senior with direct recruited junior appointed on or after 01.01.2006
Sir,
This is regarding stepping of pay of promotee senior with reference to direct recruited junior appointed after 01.01.2006.
1. The issue was examined in this office and referred to Ministry of HRD for clarification.
Ministry of HRD vide letter No.F.3-43/2008/UT.2 dated 20th March 2009
has clarified that the stepping up of pay of the promotee senior with
direct recruited junior appointed on or after 01.01.2006 may be agreed
to subject to fulfilment of the following conditions:
(a)
Stepping up the basic pay of seniors under the above provision can be
claimed only in the case of those cadres which have an element of direct
recruitment and In cases where a directly recruited junior is actually
drawing more basic pay than the seniors. In such cases, the basis pay of
the seniors will be stepped up with reference to the basic pay of the
junior.
(b) Using the above provision, Government servants cannot claim stepping up their revised basic py with reference to entry pay in the revised pay structure for direct
recruits appointed on or after 1.1.2006 as laid down in Section II of
Part A of First Schedule to the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008, if their cadre
does not have an element of direct recruitment, or in cases were no
junior is drawing basic pay higher than them.
(C)
Stepping up of pay of the seniors in accordance with the above
provision shall not be applicable in cases where direct recruits have
been granted advance increments at the time of recruitment.
The issues prevailing in the region may be decided as per above clarifications.
Yours faithfully
sd/-
sd/-
(M.A
Arumugam)
Joint.Commissioner (Fin)
Arumugam)
Joint.Commissioner (Fin)
Source: www.kvsangathan.nic.in
http://www.kvsangathan.nic.in/GeneralDocuments/ann-20-07-12.PDFhttp://www.kvsangathan.nic.in/GeneralDocuments/ann-20-07-12.PDF]
http://www.kvsangathan.nic.in/GeneralDocuments/ann-20-07-12.PDFhttp://www.kvsangathan.nic.in/GeneralDocuments/ann-20-07-12.PDF]
Guidelines for checking delays in grant of sanction of prosecution — strict compliance thereof.
No. 420/01/2012-AVD-IV
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training
North Block, New Delhi-110001.
Dated the 20th July, 2012.
OFFICE-MEMORANDUM
Subject:- Guidelines for checking delays in grant of sanction of prosecution — strict compliance thereof.
Attention is invited to this Department's
O.M. Nos. 399/33/2006-AVD.III dated 06.11.2006 & 20.12.2006 and
O.M. No. 372/19/2012-AVD.III dated 03.05.2012 on the subject cited
above.
2. In a recent meeting taken by Secretary (Personnel) to review the cases for sanction of prosecution against public servants pending with various Ministries / Departments, the following issues emerged:-
(a) It was noted that in a significant no. of cases pertaining to banks and PSUs etc., the Disciplinary Authorities first decline the sanction and thereafter seek advice of CVC. This is in clear violation of DOP&T's
instructions issued vide O.M. 399/33/2006-AVD.III dated 06.11.2006
wherein it is stipulated that the competent authority shall take a
tentative view regarding the action to be taken and seek advice of CVC in the matter and on receipt of the advice from the
CVC, the concerned Ministry / Department shall finalise its views. It
is reiterated that before passing orders on requests for sanction for
prosecution, the instructions issued by this Department are strictly adhered to.
(b) It
was also noticed that various Ministries / Departments do not adhere to
the stipulated time limit. It is imperative that the stipulated time
limit must be strictly adhered to. The guidelines issued by DOPT vide
O.M. No. 399/33/2006-AVD-III dated 06.11.2006 & 20.12.2006, have
recently been modified vide O.M. No. 372/19/2012-AVD.III dated
03.05,2012 to empower the disciplinary authority to take final view in
such matters within three months and that in disagreement cases DOPT's
advice would be taken into account before passing final orders.
(c) Protracted
correspondence made by the Administrative Ministries with the CBI/CVC
for clarifications/reconsideration, etc. are strictly not necessary and
disciplinary authority can, in most cases, take a decision on the basis of records
which are available with it. As per the extant instructions, the
Disciplinary Authority should not entertain representations from individuals themselves as this would be an endless process which often delays the matter and results in non-adherence to the prescribed time lines for processing such cases. This Department's
instruction dated 6th November, 2006 has clearly stated that the
concerned Ministry/Department shall refer the case to CVC for
reconsideration only in exceptional cases when new facts come to light.
(d) The administrative Departments should avoid making repeated references to the CVC for reconsideration of their
advice and, in all cases where they propose to disagree with the advice
given by CVC, the matter should be promptly referred to the DoP&T
(as a disagreement case), seeking DoP&T's views in the matter.
(e) Wherever,
the disagreement cases are referred to DoP&T for views/ advice and
once DoP&T gives its views, the Disciplinary Authority may have to
take a considered final decision, keeping in view the advice given by
DoP&T. The instructions contained in this Department's O.Ms dated 06.11.2006 and 20.12.2006, as modified O.M. dated 03.05.2012 in this regard shall be compiled with strictly by all Ministries/Departments.
Sd/-
(V.M. Rathnam)
Deputy Secretary(V-IV)
TeEmployment news of this week from 21st July to 27th July 2012
Job Highlights (21 Jul - 27 Jul 2012)
|
Source : http://www.employmentnews.gov.in/
|
Retirement age 65 : Cabinet today approved the proposal to relax the condition of enhancement of age of superannuation of teachers to 65
The
Cabinet today approved the proposal to relax the condition of
enhancement of age of superannuation of teachers to 65 in state
institutions for the implementation of the revised pay scales on the
basis of 6lh Pay Commission recommendations and become eligible for
receiving Central share of 80% of the arrear payment.
It
also decided that reimbursement of 80% of the Central share of the
arrears be paid in 2-3 instalments to those States who have already made
the payment and submitted their proposals for reimbursements to the
Central Government.
The
decision of Cabinet is expected to provide relief to teachers in State
institutions with the payment of arrears. It will also benefit State
Governments, who will be able to make the arrear payment in instalments
and also claim reimbursements simultaneously.
Background:
Following
the revision of pay scales of Central Government employees on the
recommendation of the 6ifl Pay Commission, the pay scales of teachers
and other equivalent cadres was revised and age of superannuation was
enhanced to 65 in December 2008. The scheme of revised pay scales was
essentially for teachers in Central Educational Institutions. However,
provisions of the Scheme could be made applicable by State Governments,
to Universities and Colleges coming under the purview of the State
Governments, provided the State Governments adopt and implement the
scheme as a composite scheme, including the enhanced age of
superannuation.
The
Central Government decided to provide financial assistance to the
extent of 80% as reimbursement to those State Governments, which may opt
for these revised pay scales for the period 1.1 2006 to 31.3.2010 The
remaining 20% was to be met by the State Government from its own
resources. The Central assistance was subject to the condition relating
to the enhancement of the age of superannuation of university and
college teachers to 65 years.
Many
State Governments had requested the Central Government to waive the
condition relating to enhancement of age of superannuation of teachers
to 65 years as they were finding it difficult to accept the condition
relating to enhancement of age of superannuation and the condition that
the State Governments should first disburse the arrears and then seek
reimbursement from Central Government to the extent of 80% of these
arrears.
Source : PIB
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)