In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has held
that marks obtained by a student in CBSE board exam cannot be revealed
under the transparency law as it would “defeat” the purpose of the new
grading system.
The court set aside the verdict of a
single judge bench and the Central Information Commission, which had
asked the Central Board of Secondary Education to reveal marks obtained
by a girl in her Class X board examination in 2010.
“We
are unable to agree; we feel that the CIC as well as the learned single
judge, by directing disclosure of ‘marks’, in the regime of ‘grades’
have indeed undone what was sought to be done by replacing marks with
grades and defeated the very objective thereof.
“The
objective, in replacing the marks with grades, as can be gathered from
the documents on record, was to grade students in a bandwidth rather
than numerically...,” a bench of Acting Chief Justice A.K. Sikri and
Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw said.
Writing the
judgement, Endlaw said the details of marks, obtained by the student in
10th board, cannot be termed as an “information” under the Right to
Information Act as its disclosure would defeat the policy of awarding
grades instead of marks.
Allowing the plea of
CBSE, it said “no weightage can also be given to the plea of respondent
(girl’s father) that the marks even if disclosed would not be used for any other purpose.
“The
possibility of respondent and his ward, in securing admission and for
other purposes, using the said information to secure an advantage over
others cannot be ruled out.”
The apex transparency
panel had allowed the plea of the student saying “since, the marks were
available with the appellant (CBSE) and since none of the exemptions
under the RTI Act were attracted to support the non disclosure thereof,
the appellant was bound to and directed to provide the information
sought.”
Aggrieved by the order, CBSE appealed to the single judge bench of the High Court which upheld the order of the CIC.
The
CBSE then filed an appeal against the order before a division bench
which allowed its plea that disclosure of the marks would dilute and
defeat the grading system.
“We have already held
above that disclosure of marks, which though exists with the appellant
would amount to allowing play to the policy earlier prevalent of marking
the examinees. Merely because the appellant/its examiners for the
purpose of grading, first mark the students would not compel this court
to put at naught or to allow full play to the new policy of grades,” it
said.
Anil Kumar Kathpal, the father of the girl, had
sought the details of the marks saying “this information will help me
to identify her weak areas in studies and take timely action, so that
she can pursue her career after Class XII.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment